Friday, November 11, 2011

Happy 11.11.11

Today is the 11th day of the 11th month of the 11th year (or the 21st century :( )

And to celebrate, here are 11 pictures of the 11th Doctor!
1. A cute Doctor
2. An almost naked Doctor
3. Bearded, crazy Doctor
4. Doctor with a straw. (Rory is shocked)
5. The Doctor can count to 5
6. Doctor gets a kiss
7. Doctor wants another (or else is pretending to be a fish)
8. Doctor bites his way out of handcuffs
9. River thinks the Doctor's beard is hot
10. Doctor eats fish with fish face
11. "I'm watching you," says the Doctor, as he bids farewell


Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Why the opposition are so opposing

I went on a training course today for my new job. The training course was on the mechanics of government, specifically on how it relates to the work I do, and to give me a picture of how my work fits into the system. 

I learnt a heck of a lot, including what to do if I was asked to report to a select committee.

I guess there was one area in particular for which I had an 'Aha!" moment, and that was the role of the opposition.

My confusion came from the understanding that all politicians want what is best for the country (or at least for their constituency), and that while there are some areas for which different parties and individuals have different opinions for what is 'best' for the country, there are others areas for which it does not matter which party was in power, they would do basically the same thing (for example the response to a natural disaster).

However, the opposition opposes everything the current government does, whether or not they personally agree with it. Before I could not understand why this is, I wondered if it was just to look like they were different from the current government. Then an explanation that came today made me see what is really going on.

What I learnt was that this 'opposing' by the opposition is only during one small (but widely televised) part of the government workings. And this part was the part held within the debating chambers, that is, this was the part of the government for debates. 

Debating is something I did a bit of in highschool. With debating you were assigned a statement (or moot) and a position. Sometimes you had a choice on what position you took, but often you just had to accept the position given to you. If you are affirming the moot, you have to present an argument that the statement is correct, and you have to do your best to uphold that position against any attacks from opposing arguments. Those negating have to find any holes in the arguments of the affirming, and to bring up any arguments they can to prove the statement as incorrect. For a debater to back down and admit that their position is wrong, is to admit defeat and lose the debate. Debating is not about being right, it is about presenting your assigned position on the moot.

So, back to parliament. The current government is suggesting new legislation. This bill will impact on the people of New Zealand, and it is therefore the responsibility of those in parliament to get this legislation right.

As I said earlier, all politicians (should) want what is best for their constituents. Therefor, in order to make sure the legislation is the best it can be, there is a need of someone to try to pick holes in it. And this is what the opposition does. There opposing the legislation is not about their own political preferences, it is about them making sure the current government is being held accountable for the legislation they are passing.

As I said earlier, this is only a small part of the process. Today I also learnt a lot about the Select Committee Process. Members of both the government and the opposition are part of this process, but in this part they do not have debates. Instead the read submissions and listen to expert advise and work together to put together a piece of legislation which will best address the problem at hand. This part is much more cooperative, much more boring, and much less televised.

The fact is the government needs an opposition, and we as members of the public should be very glad we have them.

As for me and my new job, I am in the area of providing the information for the government to see how well past initiatives have worked, and to help them make the best decisions on future policies. I might sometimes have one hour to get information to the minister the she needs before question time, but otherwise I can leave the debating to the politicians.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

The Problems with Culture

First off, I am not saying that culture is always a bad thing, to be without culture is to be, well, uncultured.

But I want to talk to talk about the problems which occur because of culture. I think I can divide it into two catgories, misunderstandings between cultures, and mistaking culture for something else.

MISUNDERSTANDINGS BETWEEN CULTURES
Once upon a time cultures developed in complete independence of each other. These cultures were created to help people understand each other, setting up social norms, defining what is acceptable behavior and what is not. I will put this here now, there are cultural practises which still exist today which violate people's human rights.I will get back to this later.
So these cultures developed in isolation from each other and everyone within the same community knew what the social norms were (whether or not they liked them was another thing), and everyone understood each other.
Then people did what people seem to like to do and started moving around. The result was communities from two or more cultures living together. This caused problems, as people were used to judging people by their own culture, but these other people, they were doing something completely different. Many misunderstanding came about, stereotypes grew, and things just escalated out of control. 
Let me show you an example, let us take two communities. In one community it is disrespectful to look an elder in the eye. Looking someone in the eye shows that you think you are an equal with them. Therefor if a young person looked into the eye of an authoritative figure while said authoritative figure was talking to them, they would be being extremely rude. 
In the other community, to look someone in the eye shows that you have integrity, that you have nothing to hide from them. In this culture if you do not look someone in the eye this is a sign of dishonesty. 
Now put these two cultures together. A policeman from culture two is questioning a teenage boy from culture one. The boy is a good kid, always respectful to his elders, so he does not look the policeman in the eye. The policeman observes the way the kid never looks in his eye, and he becomes suspicious, and questions the boy harder.. The policeman then thinks that teenage boys from this other culture are dishonest and shifty, the teenage boy begins to believe the police have it in for him. Just look at many problem communities to see what happens next.

The key to overcoming this problem is quite simple, we need to learn about other cultures, and accepting that while the practices of other cultures are not necessarily better or worse, they are just different. In above example, if the policeman had known that in the teenage boys culture, not looking someone in the eye is a sign of respect, he would have realized the boy was not being dishonest.

MISTAKING RELIGION FOR SOMETHING ELSE
My main rant here is about mixing up cultural practises with religious ones, but the same thing can be translated to mistaking something cultural for something racial. A lot of racism comes from people of different cultures. Scientifically there is only one human race. There are only a very small number of genes which actually determine someones skin colour, and none of them have any impact on how a person thinks or behaves.
There are a lot of mistakes made about Islam and the Muslim faith, and a lot of it comes down to mistaking cultural practices for religious practices. There are some communities (and countries) which have some barbaric cultural practices and which are predominantly Islamic. But this does not mean that the Islam faith causes these practices. 
Let us use a quite controversial issue, how woman dress.
In the past one hundred years what Western culture has regarded as socially acceptable women's wear has changed considerable. We are now encountering other cultures in which this change has not occured (or change occured in the opposite direction).
The wearing of the Burqa is not an Islamic practise. According to the writings of the Qa'ran (at least to my knowledge) it states that a woman must dress modestly. The Bible has similar guidelines.
But what does modest mean? 
In Malaysia Muslim woman cover everything but their hands, feet and face. Some of them wear clothing which is baggy, others clothes are very well tailored and form-fitting. This is what the culture of the Malay people has dictated modest clothing to be.
But among other cultural groups "modesty" has been interpreted as the woman being fully covered. This is a cultural thing. Is it the right interpretation? I would say no, because I find it very easy to start forgetting that the clothes in front of me are actually a person. While a woman who is wearing a head scarf, but I can still see her face, I know she is a person.
In a similar vein, "honour killings" are not an Islamic practice, but they are a cultural practice of some Islamic groups. It is not hard to argue that murdering a young woman, often for something that is no fault of her own, is wrong.
There is a need to seperate this understanding because not adequetly seperating them can led to two problems.
1) Islamophobia (or racism). This is being caused by people assuming that the practises of a minority of a group to the majority, (or even the practices of the majority to every single person). This only widens the gap between the two different groups.
2) Negligence of the real issue. People are so worried about people's religious freedom that they forget that these cultural practices are actually putting other people's human rights at risk. Should we tolerate something which violates basic human rights because they claim it is a religious practice? Many people who are protesting against these same practices are of the same religion. They are not going against their religion, they are calling out these practices for what they are.

My end word is this, we must not be afraid of speaking out against practices that we see are not right, which should not be allowed to continue, but we must also be careful not to stereotype, to blame the bigger group for the work of the smaller group.
Instead we need to work from within a culture, to change attitudes, not necessarily to the Western way, but to a way which respects everyone's human rights. 
We need to look at the origins of these practices, find where they went wrong, fix them, develop a new culture, a culture of respect.

Look past the stereotypes, find the person underneath and get to know them.
You might just find the best friend you have ever had.
 
 


Thursday, October 20, 2011

Captured

I have decided that this song is my theme song for my Nanowrimo novel.
Whatever turned my love into despair?

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

A tip for the job hunter

Just because a job advert is asking for someone more experienced then you does not mean that you should not apply for the job.
When I first saw the ad for a particular job I did not think I would have a chance at getting the position, because it seemed to be asking for someone with significant experience, and I have not yet worked in my field of study.
But I applied anyway, because the job was in an area I particularly wanted to work in.
I am so glad I did, because they obviously decided my experience was not too lacking and they interviewed me. In the interview they mainly focused on the experience I had acquired while at university. Don't undervalue what you do at university, it is not just about getting a degree, it is also about learning the skills which employers are looking for
So, yeah, I got a call today, and let's just say I am very glad I applied for that job.

Friday, October 14, 2011

How to clean your room.

I finally cleaned out my room today.

I had been meaning to do this for ages, but somehow whenever I got started I would only complete a small amount before being distracted by something else. And so junk piled up here and there, in any space it could find, the floor, the desk, the spare bed.

What one really needs to get ones room clean is motivation. And today my motivation is very good, my friend is coming to stay the night. 

So all that junk on the spare bed needs to be moved. Now that is all gone, my floor looks like a mess. Why not sort out all that junk on my desk while I am at it.

Ah, much better now.

Is it still called a sleepover when you are an adult?

So, tonight I am having the adult version of a sleep over.

Wait, that sounds dodgy. >.>

In other news, I have had two interviews this week. I would prefer to be offered the second position I went for, and they should be getting back to me first, which I am pleased about.

I am now having to undertake psychometric testing for both potential employers.

Fun and games.

My room still needs a vacuum, so I will go see if I can find one.

Toodledoo for now.
Dew

Sunday, October 09, 2011

Why Markets Crash; Don't Panic.

Today I have been researching the events surrounding the US credit downgrading from AAA to AA-plus which happened in August, and the impact it has had and will have on the New Zealand economy.
New Zealand's credit rating was downgraded just last week, but I think that will get a seperate post.

What I find interesting is not the downgrading itself, but the events that happened the week immediately after the downgrading. Everybody panicked.

Well, not everybody, but a number of investors got worried about their investment portfolio, especially the riskier elements. They began to sell their shares in these riskier investments which led to a decrease in the price of these shares. This caused more investors with investments in these shares to panic, and sell off their shares. And so on...

The result of a large number of investors suddenly deciding to sell their 'riskier' shares was a market crash. This market crash lasted about a week, before some smart investors realized that the shares in some investment options were hugely undervalued and began buying them. The market price then rose until it reached something nearer to the true value of those shares.

So after those two weeks of trading we have investors who panicked and ended up selling investments at a price lower than they were worth, thus losing value on their investment portfolio. Others made smart (but risky) decisions and bought shares at bargain prices, thus increasing the value of their portfolio.

The moral of the story is, don't panic. Also, be careful how you spread your risk. 


I am no investment expert, I do not yet have that sort of money, but from my background in probability I've heard it is best to invest most of your money in safe low-risk investments that will give a lower but steady return, and only invest a small amount, an amount you won't mind losing, in high-risk/high-return investments. Think of it as a smart type of lottery ticket. Then you just have to ride the roller-coaster which is the ups and downs of the financial markets. 
It is always dangerous to try to jump on or off a moving roller-coaster.

Dew

Friday, October 07, 2011

The Search for Work.

Recently I began to look for my first real job. This is a scary adventure that we all must face at some point in our lives. Jobs do not land on our laps just because we graduated from university.

To anyone who is looking, or shall soon be looking for work, be warned, looking for work does take up a lot of time and energy. There is truth to the statement, that it is a job looking for a job.

My first day of job hunting was taken up pulling together a rough draft of my CV for the type of work I am looking for. The next day I acquired some expert help on how to improve my CV, and then spent several hours following up on her advice until I had created a CV I was proud of. I spent the rest of the day writing a cover letter and submitting my first application to a potential future employer.

For each new job I've applied for I have used the same CV (with some minor changes), as most of the jobs I am applying for are looking for the same skill set. However, for each job I write up a cover letter from scratch which can take several hours.

So far this work seems to be paying off. I have been called back by four potential employers, three of them in the past two days.

So now I seem to be in the second phase, preparing for interviews.

I better start preparing,
Dew.